Discover how Nubank scaled their testing strategy by moving from end-to-end test suites to contract and acceptance testing.

Introduction

In the fast-paced world of fintech, maintaining software quality while accelerating development cycles is paramount. Nubank, one of the world’s leading digital banks, faced this exact challenge. Their initial reliance on end-to-end (E2E) testing provided a foundation for quality assurance but soon revealed scalability issues as the company expanded. To address these challenges, Nubank transitioned to a more robust testing strategy, incorporating contract and acceptance testing. This case study explores their journey and the positive outcomes of this strategic shift.

The Limitations of End-to-End Testing

End-to-end testing has been a staple in software development for ensuring that all components of an application work seamlessly together. However, Nubank encountered several obstacles with their E2E approach:

Scalability Issues: As Nubank’s application grew in complexity, maintaining comprehensive E2E test suites became increasingly cumbersome.
Long Run Times: Extensive E2E tests often led to prolonged testing cycles, delaying deployments and affecting agility.
Flakiness: Intermittent test failures, commonly known as “flaky tests,” reduced confidence in test results and increased maintenance overhead.

These challenges highlighted the need for a more scalable and efficient testing methodology that could keep pace with Nubank’s rapid growth.

Embracing Contract Testing

To overcome the limitations of E2E testing, Nubank adopted contract testing. This approach focuses on verifying the interactions between different services or components through well-defined contracts. Here’s how Nubank implemented contract testing:

Defining Clear Contracts

Nubank established clear contracts between frontend and backend services. These contracts specify the expected inputs and outputs, ensuring that each service adheres to agreed-upon interfaces.

Isolating Services

By isolating services, Nubank could test each component independently. This isolation reduces dependencies and makes it easier to identify and fix issues without affecting the entire system.

Enhancing Test Reliability

Contract testing significantly improved test reliability. With well-defined contracts, the number of flaky tests decreased, and the overall stability of the testing process was enhanced.

Integrating Acceptance Testing

Acceptance testing plays a critical role in bridging the gap between development and end-user expectations. Nubank integrated acceptance testing into their strategy to ensure that the application met business requirements and user needs.

Defining Acceptance Criteria

Nubank worked closely with stakeholders to define clear acceptance criteria for each feature. These criteria served as the foundation for acceptance tests, ensuring that the developed features aligned with user expectations.

Automating Acceptance Tests

Automating acceptance tests allowed Nubank to verify that new features met the defined criteria consistently. This automation led to faster feedback loops and reduced the likelihood of regressions.

Enhancing Collaboration

Acceptance testing fostered better collaboration between development, QA, and product teams. By aligning on acceptance criteria, all teams worked towards a common goal, improving overall product quality.

The Benefits of the Transition

Transitioning from E2E to contract and acceptance testing yielded numerous benefits for Nubank:

Increased Scalability: The new testing strategy scaled effortlessly with Nubank’s growing application, minimizing maintenance efforts.
Faster Testing Cycles: Reduced test run times enabled quicker deployments, enhancing the company’s agility in responding to market demands.
Improved Test Reliability: With fewer flaky tests and more precise test cases, Nubank enjoyed greater confidence in their testing results.
Enhanced Collaboration: Clear acceptance criteria and effective communication among teams led to higher-quality features and better user satisfaction.

Leveraging Modern Testing Tools

To support their enhanced testing strategy, Nubank utilized advanced testing tools that complemented contract and acceptance testing methodologies. Tools like Bugster, an AI-powered end-to-end testing platform, played a vital role in automating test creation and maintenance. Bugster’s ability to simulate real user behavior and integrate seamlessly with Nubank’s development workflows further streamlined the testing process.

Bugster’s Role in Nubank’s Testing Strategy

Automated Test Writing: Bugster reduced the burden of manual test scripting, allowing developers to focus on feature development.
Real-User Simulation: By mimicking actual user interactions, Bugster identified edge-case bugs that traditional testing methods might overlook.
Seamless Integration: Bugster integrated with Nubank’s existing tools and deployment platforms, ensuring a smooth testing workflow.

Conclusion

Nubank’s transition from end-to-end to contract and acceptance testing exemplifies a strategic shift towards more scalable and reliable testing methodologies. By addressing the limitations of E2E testing and embracing contract and acceptance testing, Nubank enhanced their software quality, reduced deployment delays, and fostered better collaboration across teams. Modern testing tools like Bugster further empowered Nubank to automate and optimize their testing processes, ensuring that they continue to deliver outstanding financial services to their users.

Ready to elevate your testing strategy? Discover how Bugster can transform your testing processes with AI-powered automation. Visit Bugster today!